overhead of namei (was: ... would you want in the GNU OS?)
Snoopy
snoopy at sopwith.UUCP
Sun Jun 4 03:53:08 AEST 1989
In article <400 at amc-gw.UUCP> jhall at emu.UUCP (John Hall) writes:
| I would be willing to take a performance hit in namei(), if this idea
| was well implemented. Think of the incredible functionality it would
| provide! In any case, namei() is used only when opening "files" and
| slightly lower performance here would not affect system performance
| much at all.
"With the addition of the two caches, the percentage of system time
devoted to name translation dropped from 25 percent to less than 10
percent."
_The Design and Implementation of the 4.3BSD UNIX Operating System_
by Leffler, McKusick, Karels, and Quarterman
It appears that namei() soaks up more cycles than one might expect.
_____ .-----.
/_____\ Snoopy ./ RIP \.
/_______\ qiclab!sopwith!snoopy | |
|___| parsely!sopwith!snoopy | tekecs |
|___| sun!nosun!illian!sopwith!snoopy |_________|
"I *am* the next man!" -Indy
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list