FCC doing it again...
Conor P. Cahill
cpcahil at virtech.uucp
Tue Nov 28 12:15:14 AEST 1989
In article <21536 at adm.BRL.MIL>, AGRISCS at umcvmb.missouri.edu (Don Ingli) writes:
> Please allow me to express my displeasure with the FCC proposal
> which would authorize a surcharge for the use of modems on the
> telephone network. This regulation is nothing less than an
> attempt to restrict the free exchange of information among the
> growing number of computer users. Calls placed using modems
> require no special telephone company equipment, and users of
> modems pay the phone company for use of the network in the form
> of a monthly bill. In short a modem call is the same as a voice
> call, and should not be subject to any additional charges.
Not that I want to pay a surcharge, but...
A modem phone call is not the same as a voice phone call. Modem calls are
continuously transmitting tones on the line, while a voice call has lots
of periods of silence. This makes modem calls harder to multiplex on the
phone network than voice calls.
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Conor P. Cahill uunet!virtech!cpcahil 703-430-9247 !
| Virtual Technologies Inc., P. O. Box 876, Sterling, VA 22170 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list