Re^2: FCC doing it again...
    Earl Wallace 
    earlw at Apple.COM
       
    Wed Nov 29 11:48:13 AEST 1989
    
    
  
In article <34661 at cornell.UUCP> murthy at alsvid.cs.cornell.edu (Chet Murthy) writes:
>...
>Read the article more carefully.  And think.  The Post Office charges less
>for bulk mail because it's not much more costly to do the routing of
>a large package than it is for a small package.  The major cost is the
>human one - handling.  So it makes sense to charge less per lb. for bulk
>than for letters.
>...
Hummm... I think you missed the ':-)' somehow....
    
    
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list