shmat() system call?
Warren Tucker
wht at n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US
Fri Aug 17 05:15:40 AEST 1990
In article <THOMAS.90Aug16123252 at uplog.uplog.se> thomas at uplog.se (Thomas Tornblom) writes:
>In article <187 at n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US> wht at n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US (Warren Tucker) writes:
>
> In article <27 at astph.UUCP> jeff at astph.UUCP (8592x2) writes:
> To be sure, specify the attach address, regardless of what the FM says.
>This is not guaranteed to work. Typically the kernel allocates the addresses
>depending of the memory layout of the running process.
In all of the implementations I have used, the kernel performs this
optimzation. And of course, it has been working me for 4 years.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Warren Tucker, TuckerWare gatech!n4hgf!wht or wht at n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US
"Tell the moon; don't tell the March Hare: He is here. Do look around."
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list