UNIX futures
Cory Kempf
cory at 3letter.MV.COM
Thu May 3 11:16:19 AEST 1990
pete at romed.UUCP (Pete Rourke) writes:
>Has anyone assembled ideas on what UNIX's future might be in 2000?
I have not assembled any collections of ideas, but I have thought
about it a lot...
>With all of the hardware makers talking about 2000 MIPS in a desktop/side
>system with multiple processors, and very unique operator interfaces,
>(like virtual reality & "Knowledge Navigator"), I'd imagine there will
>be a lot of unique things happening to the operating enviornments.
Personally, I would prefer a system with 2 BIPS over 2000 MIPS, :-)
Seriously, raw processing power will probably not have as much of an
impact as improvements in memory and interface technologies will.
For example, consider a 100 MIPS system with say, 1TB of non-volatile
zero wait state RAM... and a 3D 24 bit/pixel Colour Display system
combined with dataglove technology.
>Has there been a discussion of what actually will be the human interface
>in 2000?
A while back, when the nExt was first comming out, there was a discussion
about what the next generation user interfaces would look like. Most of
the ideas centred around a 3D virtual office metaphor.
Using current technology, we have the ability to produce a 3D display.
Nintendo is already marketing a dataglove. I have seen two different
technologies that their proponents claim will offer memory in the TaraByte
range at reasonable cost in a few years. (I have yet to see them on the
market though). If you put 4 88k processors on a single system, you
should be able to get about 100 MIPS. Several other companies have
processors that give similar performance.
I hope to see such a system offered in the next five years or so... with
a pricetag of about $15,000.
>How much will simulation play in the natural interface to the human from
>the computer?
That question is directly related to how much we can expect the humans to
be able/willing to learn. If we expect little, the systems will most likely need
to have a very solid metaphor, simulating something in the "real world (tm)"
that people understand already. What will these be with a generation that
has grown up with computers?
+C
--
Cory Kempf I do speak for the company (sometimes).
Three Letter Company 603 883 2474
email: cory at 3letter.mv.com, decvax!bu-tyng!3letter!cory, harvard!zinn!3letter!cory
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list