Call for discussion, COMP.UNIX rereorganisation

[Brian L Moore]

peter at ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:

>After looking at other successful hierarchies, I've decided that there are
>a large number of potential UNIX groups that are missing from the comp.unix
>hierarchy...

I vote for:
>	comp.unix.wizards	Of, by, and for UNIX wizards
>	comp.unix.hackers	Of, by, and for UNIX hackers
>	comp.unix.gurus		Of, by, and for UNIX gurus
>	comp.unix.reviews	Reviews of UNIX software packages
>	comp.unix.vendors	Notes and complaints about UNIX vendors
>	comp.unix.tech		Technical discussion about UNIX
>	comp.unix.funny		Humorous articles about UNIX
>	comp.binaries.unix	UNIX binaries, X backgrounds, etc.

I have not comment on:
>	comp.unix.rumors	What OSF and UI will do next.
>	comp.unix.embedded	Embedded systems running UNIX
>	comp.unix.clones	Minix, Coherent, etc...
>	comp.unix.futures	UNIX in the stock market

-blm
--
Brian L Moore, Student Programmer              |
Purdue University Engineering Computer Network |  internet: blm at ecn.purdue.edu
MSEE Building, Room 104                        |  BITNET: BMOORE at PURCCVM
W. Lafayette, IN  47906      (317) 494-5745    |