(was slashes, now NFS devices)
Melinda Shore
shore at mtxinu.COM
Sat Mar 2 13:49:14 AEST 1991
In article <BZS.91Feb22163556 at world.std.com> bzs at world.std.com (Barry Shein) writes:
>The proper (ahem/IMHBCO) approach to this is just another device type
>in the file system (it could either be totally new, or just some sort
>of new use of a pre-allocated major/minor) which means "I am a remote
>device".
The Goddess knows that I am NO fan of CMU's RFS, but their naming
conventions provide a simple facility for doing this. Arbitrary
mount points are not permitted, and remote files are referred to
as something like /../remotehost/thisdir/thatdir/filename (yup,
/.. and / are different directories). So, /../remotehost/dev/rmt0
refers to the tape drive on the remote host and provides access to
remote devices without having to create a shell on the remote.
I still prefer that a remote filesystem allow for arbitrary mount
points.
--
Software longa, hardware brevis
Melinda Shore shore at mtxinu.com
mt Xinu ..!uunet!mtxinu.com!shore
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list