XENIX drivers for ATI VGAWonder
Joe Foster
6600joef at ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu
Mon Apr 22 12:14:39 AEST 1991
In article <1991Apr17.221222.4424 at midway.uchicago.edu> goer at ellis.uchicago.edu (Richard L. Goerwitz) writes:
>With this kind of obstinacy and short-sightedness, it's hardly any wonder
>that the quantity of publicly accessible software available for SCO Xenix
>is so limited. Maybe I'm just a starry-eyed academic, but if someone calls
>and says they want to do some free work for you that will make your system
>more accessible to users, you hand over some information. It's not as if
>we're talking about trade secrets. It's not as if letting ATI specs into
>the wrong hands will cut into SCO or ATI's business in any way.
>Stupid stupid.
>(Thanks to Joe Foster for so kindly communicating his efforts to the rest
>of us.)
>-Richard
>--
You are an incurable starry-eyed academic. Either that, or I have gotten used
to being accused of being a clonemaker/pirate whenever I ask a company for
the low-level info needed to write a working driver. Tech support people that
aren't familiar with UNIX/XENIX just don't know that you can't use the BIOS
in XENIX, and are dubious when I tell them this. Oh, I finally harassed ATI
enough for them to agree to sell me the VGAWonder technical reference for
another $40. I had to repeat "it's cheaper than a Silicon Graphics coprocessor"
to myself about 10 times. All this to get a toy 3-D graphics package I wrote
to make pretty pictures! I wish SCO included sample source code for a screen
driver with their development system, since those are a lot different from
either block or character devices, and there are a lot more kinds of requests
that have to be handled, or are all those just for text modes? I wish DOS could
do virtual memory (no, I *don't* want to port it to MS-Windows!) so I wouldn't
have to go through all this!
Joe "Blackbeard" Foster ;-)
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix.sco
mailing list