/etc/badtrk not big enough.

Ronald S H Khoo ronald at robobar.Co.Uk
Fri Jan 11 04:03:54 AEST 1991


Does a bigger /etc/badtrk than the one on N1-2.3.2f exist?
It's @(#) badtrk.c 1.20 88/07/01, 8086 binary and too small to
non-destructively scan the discs on our Compaq 25e's (39 sectors/track,
damn them).  Would it be reasonable to use a SCO Unix /etc/badtrk ?
Or will something horrible happen ?

Anyway, if someone's listening at SCO, please remember to put a bigger
/etc/badtrk on the 2.3.4 N1 diskette if you ever get around to releasing it.


-- 
ronald at robobar.co.uk +44 81 991 1142 (O) +44 71 229 7741 (H)



More information about the Comp.unix.xenix.sco mailing list