A/UX performance
Charles L Ditzel
benoni at ssc-vax.UUCP
Tue Apr 5 16:37:19 AEST 1988
In article <4309 at hoptoad.uucp>, gnu at hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore) writes:
> davidsen at steinmetz.steinmetz.ge.com (William E. Davidsen Jr) wrote:
> > At this time I
> > can't supply the original benchmarks.
I am always(!) suspicious of people that don't supply the benchmark code.
> Some of the numbers look pretty questionable to me, e.g. Sun-3/280 can
> do 7,650,000 trig functions per second, but only 74,300 float
> compare-and-branches? Also note that the Sun being compared is the
> highest end 68020 based Sun (25MHz, big cache, pricey).
Actually some benchmarks have already emanated from the Mac group and they
compared the lowest end Sun 3/50...they showed an A/UX Mac II do be slow.
These were posted by : fnf at fishpond.UUCP (Fred Fish)
*Ok, with all the speculation about disk I/O, and the advantages/disadvantages
*of DMA, I decided to drag out and dust of a disk performance benchmark written
*by Rick Spanbauer a LONG time ago and used to test Amiga hard disks when they
*first became available. Since I already had Sun 3/50 timings, all I had to
*do were the A/UX ones. Here are my measured results using the diskperf.c
*program, and ballpark verified using the Unix dd program:
*Performance timings using Rick Spanbauer's diskperf.c program.
* Amiga Amiga Mac-II Sun
* Floppy CLtd A/UX 3/50
* df1: dh0: HD80SC
*
*File creations (files/sec) <=1 7 6 6
*File deletions (files/sec) 1 15 8 11
*Directory scan (entries/sec) 38 50 371 350
*Seek+read (seek+read/sec) 2 40 110 298
*Read speed, 512 buffer (byte/sec) 11014 17133 55168 240499
*Read speed, 4096 buffer (byte/sec) 12024 17133 53708 234057
*Read speed, 8192 buffer (byte/sec) 12080 17133 54013 233189
*Read speed, 32768 buffer (byte/sec) 12136 17133 53644 236343
*Write speed, 512 buffer (byte/sec) 4974 12603 44181 215166
*Write speed, 4096 buffer (byte/sec) 5180 13512 47211 182466
*Write speed, 8192 buffer (byte/sec) 5170 13653 46832 179755
*Write speed, 32768 buffer (byte/sec) 5190 13797 46930 187580
*
*Notes:
* (1) All Amiga tests done under 1.2 release 33.46.
* (2) df1: tests done after "addbuffers 32" & fresh formatted disk
* (3) All Amiga and Mac-II timings done by Fred Fish.
* (4) Sun-3/50 timings by Rick Spanbauer.
As can be seen the low-end 3/50 outperforms with relative ease the
Mac II. Of course, this is not the whole story. These are the I/O
benchmarks. Other benchmarks would shed a little more light on the subject.
(drystone, whetstone, etc.). Given Apple's rather cavalier attitude toward
Unix and it's distribution... If you don't care about Mac software both
the Sun 3/50 and 3/60 make better Unix platforms and cost less or about
the same...in addition the X11/NeWS environment will soon be a standard
part of Suns.
-----------------------
Naturally My Opinions Are My Own.
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix
mailing list