Erratum 21 (Was: Re: SCO Xenix System Hang)
Dr. T. Andrews
tanner at ki4pv.uucp
Mon Dec 26 23:02:06 AEST 1988
In article <17383 at conexch.UUCP>, root at conexch.UUCP (Larry Dighera) writes:
) It would seem reasonable to approach Intel about replacing a buggy
) chip with one of their new DX parts. How could they refuse?
I suppose that they could refuse in the same way that they refused to
replace the parts which didn't work in "native" mode. If they refuse
to replace an alleged "32-bit" CPU which doesn't work in 32-bit mode,
surely they can refuse to replace for something minor like this!
--
...!bikini.cis.ufl.edu!ki4pv!tanner ...!bpa!cdin-1!cdis-1!ki4pv!tanner
or... {allegra killer gatech!uflorida decvax!ucf-cs}!ki4pv!tanner
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix
mailing list