(SCO) TCP/IP, NFS vs locking
Terry Hull
terry at tah386.manhattan.ks.us
Mon Aug 28 09:02:43 AEST 1989
In article <118 at mdi386.UUCP> bruce at mdi386.UUCP (Bruce A. McIntyre) writes:
>
>You can get the AT&T STREAMS (RFS) package for SCO UNIX from SCO. It
>also comes with XENIX-NET if you are hooking PC's to the XENIX host..
Hold it! There is a lot of difference between RFS and Streams. I have
the SCO Streams Run-time which implements AT&T streams. It does NOT provide
RFS. On the 3B2/400s I administer, RFS is build on top of streams, but
just because you have streams does not mean that you have RFS.
I understand the streams run-time will no longer be needed with SCO UNIX.
The streams modules will be in the 3.2 kernel that you get from SCO.
--
Terry Hull
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas State University
Work: terry at eecea.eece.ksu.edu, rutgers!ksuvax1!eecea!terry
Play: terry at tah386.manhattan.ks.us, rutgers!ksuvax1!eecea!tah386!terry
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix
mailing list