pid rollover?
tif at cpe.UUCP
tif at cpe.UUCP
Sat Feb 11 01:38:00 AEST 1989
Written 6:31 am Feb 8, 1989 by root44.UUCP!aegl in cpe:comp.unix.xenix
>the pid to be the index into the proc table. (and WOW, you could save
>2 bytes from the proc structure by not having a p_pid element at all!).
>What would break if you did this (do the big mainframes already do
At the very least, HDB-style pid-locking would be less useful since
a given PID is quite likely to have SOME process running.
Paul Chamberlain
Computer Product Engineering, Tandy Corp.
{killer | texbell}!cpe!tif
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix
mailing list