386 word processor performance
Fred Rump from home
fr at icdi10.UUCP
Mon May 22 02:43:02 AEST 1989
In article <66 at mdi386.UUCP> bruce at mdi386.UUCP (Bruce A. McIntyre) writes:
->In article <2161 at thor.acc.stolaf.edu->, mackenzi at thor.acc.stolaf.edu (David MacKenzie) writes:
->> How are WordPerfect and Microsoft Word on resource use on 386's?
->We use Lyrix here, because when we set this system up, there was no WORD
->or WORDPERFECT for this environment. Our setup is similar, 16mhz 80386
->with SCO386 Lyrix 5.0 and 4MB memory. The terminals are all IBM3151's in
->using WORD, as PAGEMAKER knows about WORD files... Any comment, has anyone
->done this?
Bruce, 95% of our users use Lyrix. Some chose MS Word because of dos
familiarity. Same for WP. We always recommend Lyrix because of its file
maintenance menu and general fit into the SCO office portfolio environment.
In a couple cases we went with the Sun River VP/ix and Ventura route.
It's quite a system drag and only good for the some time users for desktop.
A weekly ot monthly bulletin, that kind of stuff. Printing is sloooow. At the
office we use a separate dos 386 with lasermaster controllers etc to do lots
of desktop and for customer demos.
In general, we push for 20 or 25MhZ machines if the user talks desktop
capability with a fast big ESDI drive and lots of memory.
Fred Rump
icdi10!fr at cdin-1.uu.net
--
{allegra killer gatech!uflorida decvax!ucf-cs}!ki4pv!cdis-1!cdin-1!icdi10!fr
26 Warren St. ...{bellcore rutgers bpa uunet}!cdin-1!icdi10!fr
Beverly, NJ 08010 or INTERNET: fred at cdin-1.uu.net or fr at icdi10.UUCP
609-386-6846 "Freude... Alle Menschen werden Brueder..." - Schiller
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix
mailing list