Ideal PC terminal program for use with Xenix/Unix?
    Chuck Bentley 
    chuckb at hounix.UUCP
       
    Mon Oct  2 13:45:43 AEST 1989
    
    
  
In article <562 at crdos1.crd.ge.COM>, davidsen at crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr) writes:
> In article <22233 at looking.on.ca>, brad at looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton) writes:
> 
> |  The following things would be desirable
> |  	a) speed -- support 9600 bps on a PC.  (19.2 would be nice,
> |  		but I have yet to see one that will do this on
> |  		a PC, other than by lots of buffering and ctrl-s)
Easily accomplished.
> .
> .
> |  
> |  	b) multiscreens
> 
> |  	c) scancode mode -- like a WYSE, so that it can be used with
> |  		vp/ix etc.
Doesn't need vp/ix.  A unix version exists.
> |  
> |  	d) Some efficient smart mode that has a standard termcap.  While
> |  	   ANSI would be nice, I would rather have a usable non-ansi that
> |  	   goes 19.2 or 9600 than an ANSI that goes more slowly.
Emulates VT100 and still does high speed.
> |  
> |  	e) The ability to map \ to shift for those good feeling, but
> 
A program to modify DOS to do this is included with ZCOMM, a shareware
program that has most all the features you mention.
I use Pro-Yam (ZCOMM's big brother) on my AT under both DOS and XENIX. 
I started out with ZCOMM and liked it so much I moved up to Pro-Yam.  I
can't say enough good things about either product.
The author, Chuck Forsberg has been refining this since CP/M days
(before DOS and the IBM PC). 
You can contact him at caf at omen.UUCP.  I just saw an article from him a
moment ago in comp.unix.xenix, so I know he monitors this area.  How
about it Chuck, isn't it time to let these people know about
Pro-Yam/ZCOMM again?
By the way, I'm just a satisified customer, not a principal or employee.
		Chuck...
    
    
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix
mailing list