IBM and Apple Operating Systems (Re: dosread.c again)
Peter da Silva
peter at ficc.uu.net
Tue Oct 31 03:20:38 AEST 1989
In article <6723 at ficc.uu.net> korenek at ficc.uu.net (Gary Korenek) writes:
> 8. The point to all this: companies take massive gambles with new
> products. If it had not been for the original IBM-PC and MS-DOS,
> we would not even have what we have today.
No, we'd have something based on Concurrent CP/M, OS/9, SOS, or some other
decent DOS of that period. We'd have something better.
IBM didn't create the PC indusry. It doesn't do that any more. It looked and
it saw a thriving industry, and said "I want that". So it took it.
--
`-_-' Peter da Silva <peter at ficc.uu.net> <peter at sugar.hackercorp.com>.
'U` -------------- +1 713 274 5180.
"That particular mistake will not be repeated. There are plenty of mistakes
left that have not yet been used." -- Andy Tanenbaum (ast at cs.vu.nl)
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix
mailing list