'exit(1);' considered useless (slight flame)
    Gordon Moffett 
    gam at proper.UUCP
       
    Tue Feb  7 16:01:16 AEST 1984
    
    
  
As a maintainer and supporter of existing software, I am getting
tired of programs whose terminating action is:
	exit(1);
A typical application is:
	p = malloc(n);
	if (p == NULL) {
		exit(1);
	}
Bad enough that the original programmer didn't code for an error message,
but furthermore was content to just provide a `non-zero' error code.
In intro(2) of volume 1 of the Unix manual set are described the various
error codes returned by system calls and subroutines.  There is an
external variable (int) called `errno' where these error codes are
stored when applicable.  So, programmers, please use:
	exit(errno);
... whenever possible, so I don't have to recode it for you.
It is useful to reference the exit status of a command and have it
provide more meaningful information that just a non-zero value.
Thank you.
SEE ALSO
	perror(3)
	"lint vs. strong typing - programmers' responsibitly", Usenet:
		net.lang
-- 
Gordon A. Moffett
	{ allegra, decvax!decwrl } !amd70!proper
	hplabs!intelca!proper!gam
    
    
More information about the Comp.unix
mailing list