ls follies
Alexis Dimitriadis
alexis at reed.UUCP
Sun Aug 25 15:56:15 AEST 1985
> >> What gets me is there is no way to convince ls to produce _unsorted_
> >>output! (never mind why...
>
> How about ls -f.
>
ls -f is fine *if the argument is a single directory*.
Besides, 4.2BSD ls -f alphabetizes its "directory" arguments, before
listing each one unsorted. Try "ls -f b a" to see what I mean...
Alexis Dimitriadis
--
_______________________________________________
As soon as I get a full time job, the opinions expressed above
will attach themselves to my employer, who will never be rid of
them again.
alexis @ reed
...teneron! \
...seismo!ihnp4! - tektronix! - reed.UUCP
...decvax! /
More information about the Comp.unix
mailing list