Unix Technical Discussions V1 #7
unix at cbosgd.UUCP
unix at cbosgd.UUCP
Tue Mar 12 04:29:06 AEST 1985
From: Ron Heiby (The Moderator) <unix-request at cbosgd.UUCP>
Unix Technical Discussions Sat, 09 Mar 1985 Volume 1 : Issue 7
Today's topics:
Want Symbolic Debug for BSD2.9
Need Help with BSD2.9 dump/restor
Want to put BSD2.9 on PDP-11/24
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 19 Feb 85 20:57:59 GMT
From: jwp at uwmacc.UUCP (jeffrey w percival)
Subject: symbolic debugger for 2.9
Under version 2.8, cc has a -g (debug) option that is supposed
to provide additional symbol table information for use by a
symbolic debugger named sdb. We have 2.8 documentation for sdb but
nothing else; in 2.9 all references to sdb and the -g option
have disappeared. I would appreciate hearing from anyone with
experience using sdb, or any other symbolic debugger compatible
with version 2.8 or 2.9. I am also interested in finding out
why all references to sdb have been expunged from 2.9.
--
Jeff Percival
jwp at uwmacc.UUCP (...!{allegra,ihnp4,seismo,...}!uwvax!uwmacc!jwp)
uwmacc!jwp at wisc-rsch.ARPA
POST: Space Astronomy; UW-Madison; 1150 University Ave; Madison, Wi 53706; USA
------------------------------
Date: 17 Feb 85 22:09:47 GMT
From: jwp at uwmacc.UUCP (jeffrey w percival)
Subject: Unix 2.9 dump/restor
I am trying to get 2.9 installed on my 11/70, and have progressed to
the point of worrying about dumps and restors. I see a dump,restor
pair in /usr/src/cmd, and dump source (but no restor) in /usr/src/ucb/dump.
I see a dumprestor.h in /usr/include and in the ucb/dump area as well.
1. Will the non-ucb restor work with the ucb dump?
2. Does the ucb dumprestor.h completely supersede the one in /usr/include?
3. What about the standalone restor? Is that the same as the regular restor?
I remember in my 2.8 system having to massage some constants
until the standalone restor was < 48k... is that required in 2.9?
To summarize: how do I get a unified dump/restor (including standalone)?
I'd appreciate some mail on this. Thanks.
--
Jeff Percival
jwp at uwmacc.UUCP (...!{allegra,ihnp4,seismo,...}!uwvax!uwmacc!jwp)
uwmacc!jwp at wisc-rsch.ARPA
POST: Space Astronomy; UW-Madison; 1150 University Ave; Madison, Wi 53706; USA
------------------------------
Date: 1 Mar 85 20:06:16 GMT
From: tpsc-irt at DDN2.ARPA
Subject: 2.9 BSD on a PDP-11/24
Has anyone had any luck installing Berkeley 2.9BSD on a PDP-11/24?
(2 RL02 drives) We can boot from tape, make a file system, and install
the root file system, but when we try to boot rl(0,0)rlunix we get a
banner, the memory availible, and a panic trap type 11 (segmentation
violation). Any hints? Please reply personally, I really doubt if this
is a hot issue to most people.
Thanks in advance...
--A closed mouth gathers no foot...
Mark Fausett (tpsc-irt @DDN2)
------------------------------
End of Unix Technical Discussions
*****************************
--
Ronald W. Heiby / ihnp4!{wnuxa!heiby|wnuxb!netnews}
AT&T Information Systems, Inc.
Lisle, IL (CU-D21)
More information about the Mod.unix
mailing list