C++ vs. Objective-C

[Antony Williams]

In article <60 at cecil.UUCP> keith at cecil.UUCP writes:
>   In a comparison between
>apples and apples, i.e., Objective-C vs. C++ and my Object-Oriented
>Program Support (OOPS) class library, the latter wins on ease of
>programming and clarity of code, and should also win on speed because of
>C++ inline functions and more efficient virtual function calls.
>
>The OOPS class library is in the public domain, but I have a considerable
>amount of work left to do on the documentation before it will be in
>useable form.
>
How about posting your library to mod.sources, with a pointer
in this newsgroup, when you are happy with it?  I for one would
appreciate it.  Any other votes?
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Williams					|Informatics Division
UK JANET:	asw at uk.ac.rl.vd			|Rutherford Appleton Lab
Usenet:		{... | mcvax}!ukc!rlvd!asw	|Chilton, Didcot
ARPAnet:	asw%rl.vd at ucl-cs.arpa		|Oxon OX11 0QX, UK