volatile isn't necessary, but it's there (creeping pedanticity)
Ozan Yigit
oz at yunexus.UUCP
Sat Apr 9 15:06:45 AEST 1988
Eric S. Raymond (snark!eric) writes
>
>Yeah. Maybe we should form our own analogue of Vietnam Veterans Against The
>War; Compiler Hacks Against Compiler-hack Elitism.
>
I think, seriously, something needs to be done, and soon.
More than once, the *commercial incentives* behind this
standard has been commented upon. Needless to say, the
resulting *standard* bogosity will be cemented by the
commercial implementations of the language. My hope is
something like the Gnu C compiler may help the cause: It is
an excellent compiler, for free, and currently free from the
*standard*. [Sounds familiar: Common(?) Lisp vs. Scheme,
and Franz, and ...]
Of course, it also helps the New Testament (K&R^2) came out
just in time...
--
... and they will all Usenet: [decvax|ihnp4]!utzoo!yunexus!oz
bite the dust ... ......!seismo!mnetor!yunexus!oz
comprehensively. ... Bitnet: oz@[yusol|yulibra|yuyetti]
Archbishop Tutu Phonet: +1 416 736-5257 x 3976
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list