command line options
Doug Gwyn
gwyn at brl-smoke.ARPA
Thu Mar 31 20:57:32 AEST 1988
In article <1988Mar30.233142.2040 at utzoo.uucp> henry at utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
>This one seems to have fallen down the crack between them, actually.
>It's definitely not in X3J11, and it wasn't in POSIX the last time I looked.
My understanding is that IEEE 1003.2 is expected to deal with getopt
or equivalent.
>One should also remember, for better or worse, that getopt is a de facto
>standard. (An official one, if you believe in the SVID.)
getopt also evolved out of a Bell Labs study by Hemenway and Armitage
of the existing UNIX command options. It was designed to be the best
compromise common-ground facility, even though it was acknowledged that
a totally different option syntax might be an improvement. It probably
ought not to be foisted off on non-UNIX systems, but it makes a lot of
sense to use it for most UNIX utilities. Many times I've been saved
just by having "--" supported.
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list