`safe' putc (was avoiding stdio)

[Woodrow Baker]

In article <1990Feb9.214044.26382 at twwells.com>, bill at twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes:
> In article <670 at stealth.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd at stealth.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
> : It's wonderful that this mistake is documented. It's still a mistake.
> 
> I have this little meter; it says "don't connect to over 10,000V"
> on it.
> 
> "It's wonderful that this mistake is documented. It's still a mistake."
> 
> What horseshit!
> 
> 
> If you can't stand the limitations of the more efficient tool
> DON'T USE IT.
> 
> my choices for programming. *I* know what I'm doing and you are,
> by your suggestion, making yourself look like an ignorant lout.

And you, are making yourself look like an arrogant lout.

> Now go away while I continue to use putc, safely, just like I
> have for the past seven years.
> 

Jumpin' willies, this one has SHARK teeth...(pun intended)
Do you have sandpaper for hide?  Give the guy a break!