`safe' putc (was avoiding stdio)
Wade Guthrie
evil at arcturus.UUCP
Wed Feb 7 04:17:00 AEST 1990
chris at mimsy.umd.edu (Chris Torek) writes:
> putc *is* *documented* as not being careful about its second parameter.
ark at alice.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) writes:
>Has anyone out there actually written a program that depends
>for its correct operation on side effects of the second
>argument of putc?
Sorry, but what are the side effects of the second argument of putc?
Wade Guthrie
evil at arcturus.UUCP
Rockwell International
Anaheim, CA
(Rockwell doesn't necessarily believe / stand by what I'm saying; how could
they when *I* don't even know what I'm talking about???)
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list