Strange multiplication ?
Karl Heuer
karl at haddock.ima.isc.com
Sun Jun 17 11:00:09 AEST 1990
In article <1790 at krafla.rhi.hi.is> frisk at rhi.hi.is (Fridrik Skulason) writes:
>[On a machine with 8-bit char, 16-bit int, and 32-bit long,
> unsigned char a = 255;
> unsigned long i = 256 * a;
>produces 65280 on some compilers, -256 on others.] I had thought that when
>one operand ("a" in this case) was unsigned, ...
It's an unsigned char. Since C has no char-typed rvalues, it promotes to
unsigned int (in the unsigned-preserving model) or signed int (in the
value-preserving model). An ANSI compiler must use the value-preserving
model, in which the computation overflows but probably generates the value
-256. If the compiler is high-quality, it will also warn about your using a
questionably-signed expression in a signedness-sensitive context.
See also <16836 at haddock.ima.isc.com>, where we just finished discussing a
similar problem.
Karl W. Z. Heuer (karl at kelp.ima.isc.com or harvard!ima!karl), The Walking Lint
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list