int8, etc. (was Re: boolean)
cepek at spanky.mgi.com
cepek at spanky.mgi.com
Wed Jun 6 07:29:49 AEST 1990
In article <16784 at haddock.ima.isc.com>, karl at haddock.ima.isc.com
(Karl Heuer) writes:
> The very existence of a typedef named `int8' is questionable. (Yes,
> I know the reason.)
Since we both seem to understand reasons why "int8" would come into existence,
perhaps we could discuss why it shouldn't.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I'm not trying to start a war here. I've only been using C for 4 years
(programming for 12). I'm all for learning new methods and discussing
alternative approaches; in fact I enjoy it.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Michael Cepek "Engage." |
| Programmer/Analyst |
| Internet: Cepek at MGI.COM |
| Management Graphics, Inc. Voice: +1 612/851-6112 |
| 1401 East 79th Street Operator: +1 612/854-1220 |
| Minneapolis, MN 55425 USA Fax: +1 612/854-6913 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list