Proof that Prolog can be faster than C
Kevin D. Quitt
kdq at demott.COM
Fri Jun 15 08:31:57 AEST 1990
In article <47658 at iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> jwmills at iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Jonathan Mills) writes:
>but does list some other interesting results for TAK:
>
>IMPLEMENTATION CPU RAW TIME (sec)
>-------------- --------- --------------
>Portable Standard Lisp Cray-1 0.044
>Symbolics 3600+IFU 0.43
>Assembler 68000 0.7
>Franz Lisp VAX 780 1.09
>Common Lisp VAX 785 1.18
>Portable Standard Lisp Sun/2 (68010) 1.44
>Common Lisp VAX 780 1.83
>C 68000 1.9
>Franz Lisp 68000 2.37
>INTERLISP Dolphin 11.12
>
Just for fun, on a Motorola Delta 3608 (25MHz 68030),
cc: gnucc:
0.6 0.15 cc tak.c
0.3 0.3 cc -O tak.c
and on a TwinHead 386/25, Microsoft C 6.0
0.28 /Ox /Gs
0.22 /Ox /Gsr
--
_
Kevin D. Quitt demott!kdq kdq at demott.com
DeMott Electronics Co. 14707 Keswick St. Van Nuys, CA 91405-1266
VOICE (818) 988-4975 FAX (818) 997-1190 MODEM (818) 997-4496 PEP last
96.37% of all statistics are made up.
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list