Just a minor new twist on free()
Floyd Davidson
floyd at hayes.ims.alaska.edu
Sat Oct 27 21:51:41 AEST 1990
In article <1990Oct26.154315.26612 at zoo.toronto.edu> henry at zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes:
>In article <119 at nazgul.UUCP> bright at nazgul.UUCP (Walter Bright) writes:
>><... ( Mess - DOS doesn't count as a system (:-) ).
>>
>>If other systems are so superior, why aren't their programming environments
>>up to the standards of the MS-DOS world?
>
>Because they don't have 10^10 mindless lemmings buying them and thus
>underwriting development costs.
Not to mention that "up to the standards of" seems to apply to mindless
programmers and their idea of "standards". My perception of comparing
UNIX to MS-DOS as a programming environ is that one has a lot of frills
and no meat to it. The latest "thing" for MS-DOS doesn't hold a candle
to what UNIX was 5 years ago, much less today, when it comes to getting
some work done.
--
Floyd L. Davidson floyd at hayes.ims.alaska.edu floydd at chinet.chi.il.us
Salcha, AK 99714 connected by paycheck to Alascom, Inc.
When *I* speak for them, one of us will be *out* of business in a hurry.
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list