Some optimization results
Dik T. Winter
dik at cwi.nl
Wed May 15 10:43:20 AEST 1991
In article <14077:May1321:14:2691 at kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd at kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
> Hold on. The ``bug'' here is simply that the compiler missed an
> optimization. Do you mean to imply that any compiler which misses any
> optimization is buggy?
Yup. If the compiler tells me he is not doing it because of some reason
that is patently untrue. (In this case a non-existant dependency.)
--
dik t. winter, cwi, amsterdam, nederland
dik at cwi.nl
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list