missing ->= operator
Jonathan W Miner
jwm712 at unhd.unh.edu
Wed May 1 02:51:10 AEST 1991
In article <9104291641.AA00534 at dutiaa.tudelft.nl> schuller at DUTIAA.TUDELFT.NL (Schuller Schuller Oijen) writes:
>Hi all,
>recently I've been doing a lot of C pointer programming and I came upon
>a missing feature in C. Suppose you have this struct called mygod :
> [code deleted]
>What you do quite often is : mygodptr = mygodptr->next;
>Now C has all these wonderful operators : a += 7, g &= 0xf, etc, etc.
>But the ->= operator is missing! You cannot do mygodptr ->= next; !
>All of you who want to fill this gap, please react. Flames to /dev/null.
>Bye! Hildo Biersma, schuller at dutiad.tudelft.nl
It is my opinion that the +=, &= etc operators were implemented on systems,
such as DEC VAX that has two operand instructions. Although it would
be nice to have a ->=, it would be a programmer convenience, and it would
still be compiled into the same code as p = p->next.
Now for my question: how do the below operators compare speedwise?
C pseudo VAX code
a++; inc a;
a += 1; add2 1,a;
a = a + 1; add3 1,a,a;
Jon.
--
Jonathan Miner | I won't speak for UNH, and UNH does not
jwm712 at unhd.unh.edu | speak for me, but they'll charge me anyway!
(603)868-3416 | Hacking to graduate this May!
Moving soon to miner at mervax.sanders.com (I think?!)
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list