program to repetively display command on crt
Derek Zahn
derek at uwvax.UUCP
Fri Nov 30 20:37:20 AEST 1984
>
> "Cost" measured how? If it's fast enough, it's fast enough; it does not
> need to be made faster. Civilized people use shell scripts anywhere they
> can, with C implementations done when, and *only* when, the performance
> of a shell implementation has proven to be inadequate in real use.
>
> This applies to large programs too, by the way.
> --
> Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
Personally, I like C so well that I would rather use C than a shell script.
Especially for large programs, and for several reasons. First is the speed.
Also, the form of a C program is more easily extendable. It would be a real
drag if I wanted to extend either my or somebody else's program only to find
that it is a shell script and what I wish to add is something that you cannot
do with a shell script.
But somehow I still consider myself to be civilized, and will never object to
"silly" shell scripts that do things cultured people would do with C :-)
"Life's a bummer, and then you die."
--
Derek Zahn @ wisconsin
...!{allegra,heurikon,ihnp4,seismo,sfwin,ucbvax,uwm-evax}!uwvax!derek
derek at wisc-rsch.arpa
More information about the Comp.sources.bugs
mailing list