lots of trn problems
Bill Vermillion
bill at bilver.uucp
Tue Dec 25 03:01:44 AEST 1990
In article <3130 at litchi.bbn.com> rsalz at bbn.com (Rich Salz) writes:
>The posting had errors, you had to unpack both the orig and the reposted part 9.
>
Which didn't help at all for automatic archiving systems. The repost wiped
out the orginal. I suggest reposts need something added to their name if
it is NOT a complete direct replacement. eg part09a. So I got the
original, and the repost clobbered it. I can not fault the archiving tool,
but the fact that the repost needed (as you indicated) both the orginal and
the repost.
I have it running from the uunet sources, and I am very happy with trn.
--
Bill Vermillion - UUCP: uunet!tarpit!bilver!bill
: bill at bilver.UUCP
More information about the Comp.sources.bugs
mailing list