lots of trn problems

Bill Vermillion bill at bilver.uucp
Tue Dec 25 03:01:44 AEST 1990


In article <3130 at litchi.bbn.com> rsalz at bbn.com (Rich Salz) writes:
>The posting had errors, you had to unpack both the orig and the reposted part 9.
>

Which didn't help at all for automatic archiving systems.  The repost wiped
out the orginal.   I suggest reposts need something added to their name if
it is NOT a complete direct replacement.  eg part09a.  So I got the
original, and the repost clobbered it.  I can not fault the archiving tool,
but the fact that the repost needed (as you indicated) both the orginal and
the repost.

I have it running from the uunet sources, and I am very happy with trn.


-- 
Bill Vermillion - UUCP: uunet!tarpit!bilver!bill
                      : bill at bilver.UUCP



More information about the Comp.sources.bugs mailing list