C News patch of 7-Sep-1990
Greg A. Woods
woods at eci386.uucp
Wed Sep 19 06:59:53 AEST 1990
In article <1990Sep17.210150.1586 at vicom.com> lmb at vicom.com (Larry Blair) writes:
> They distributed the software and have actively promoted it as the `better'
> alternative. Their software has caused my site and the rest of the net
> considerable grief due to the (now fixed) inews -C bug and the overly long
> message id's (which broke rn). This is whether I run C News or 2.11. The
> problem with their patch scheme is that many admins are unsure if it is safe
> to apply a patch or if they are up to date and this has led to a continuation
> of the inews -C problem.
I *never* had a problem with the rn vs. C news, and I'm not so blind
to believe a totally different system will have the same administrative
interface. Perhaps 'inews -C' could have been avoided somehow. It's a
common mistake to assume people have more common sense than they
actually do, but if we worked with the LCD, we'd never get anywhere.
Yes, I agree they have a responsibility, but it is only to deliver
what they have been promising, which they have readily outdone
themselves with C news. They did not promise to use Configure (which
is OK by me), and they did not promise to follow blindly down the
beaten path of traditional "net"-style software maintenance (which I'm
also quite happy to see). [I would like to see a different manner of
software maintenance and configuration than now exists for C news, but
I gave up complaining and designed my own custom version.... :-)]
> There is one fact that I want to make abundantly clear: I applaud Henry and
> Geoff's efforts to write and maintain C News. Without their work many sites
> would have drowned in the ever increasing traffic on the net. There are
> things about C News over which Henry and I have disagreed ever since I
> started running it (which was before it was posted to the net), but that
> doesn't mean that I don't have a great deal of respect for him.
Same goes for me. (I ran the alpha version on a couple of sites, and
have never gone back to 2.11, and never will.)
--
Greg A. Woods
woods@{eci386,gate,robohack,ontmoh,tmsoft}.UUCP
+1-416-443-1734 [h] +1-416-595-5425 [w] VE3-TCP Toronto, Ontario CANADA
More information about the Comp.sources.bugs
mailing list