AT&T vs. CSS (PC/Tools)

[C J Luciano hotld]

 > The reason I say this is that there have been other, commercially more
 > significant, UNIX-lookalikes which AT&T did not bother. Also, when PC/VI
 > first made its appearance, a friend of mine in the Boston area told me
 > he had heard from a friend who had access to both UNIX and PC/VI source
 > code that the sources resembled each other so closely, down to flaws in
 > the coding style, that he was conviced PC/VI was a rip-off.

I believe that AT&T would not be the one who should be concerned here since
VI is licensed by AT&T from University of California at Berkeley. Therefore
it's UCB's problem.