Video recording options?

[Wes Barris]

In article <1991May9.164242.18284 at cs.yale.edu>, nathan at jacobi (Nathan F.
Janette) writes:
> 
> 1. VideoFramer
>    - high res capture
>    - 1 frame / 15 seconds
>    - $7,500 list
> 
>    stuff deleted...
> 
> It seems that it would take an awful long time to make a ten minute high res
> video capture with a reasonable number of frames!  What gives?  The sales rep
> said the slow frame capture time has to do with rgb to ntsc conversion.
> 
We use the Video Framer.  You have to supply it an IRIS "RGB" file of the
proper size.  This size varies depending on your selected mode.  For
example, I use the D1 output whose corresponding size is 720x486.  Sending
image data out the D1 (or any other) port on the Video Framer takes about
five seconds.  I send this image to an Abekas A60.  If you are going
directly to tape, you will have to do this frame-by-frame
(preroll/edit/postroll, etc.)  This process generally takes about ten
seconds per frame.

Making a 1000 frame movie could take around four hours just to record.

> Are these the only/best options?  Is there no real-time option?
> 

I have heard of some up-coming SGI product that will provide a "real-time"
scan converter and multiple-video outputs.  However, this wont help if
you can't display your images in real time.

      o o o o o o o . . .   ________________________________ _____=======_T___
    o      _____           ||Wes Barris                    | | wes at msc.edu   |
  .][__n_n_|DD[  ====_____  |Minnesota Supercomputer Center| |(612) 626-8090 |
 >(________|__|_[_________]_|University of Minnesota_______|_|_FAX: 626-1596_|_
 _/oo OOOOO oo`  ooo   ooo  'o^o^o                    o^o^o` 'o^o         o^o`
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
"You may get straight A's in school, but you've got a lot to learn about
Poker!" -- Geordi LaForge