Bell Tech 386 SysVr3 (really a put-down of Xenix)
Greg Woods
woods at gpu.utcs.toronto.edu
Thu Aug 11 10:47:10 AEST 1988
In article <6643 at conexch.UUCP> enped at conexch.UUCP (Eric Pederson) writes:
>We haven't had as much luck with SCO Xenix. I think our troubles may be due to
>poor SVID IPC support in the 2.1 Xenix for the 386. Our Alcatel 386 (with 8
>meg of RAM, and a 150 meg ESDI drive) crashed every day at least once under
>a user load of 10 or less (on intelligent serial ports). The applications
>used were very IPC oriented. We got page fault-type kernel panics with
>regularity and other bizzare panics that SCO support didn't even know existed.
Now, that's more like it. I knew someone else must have been trying to
"use" the system to the extent we did. Unfortunately, I don't think it
is just the IPC stuff to be blamed.
>Now we run Bell Tech SysV/386 and have had no crashes whatsoever. I miss
>the splendid system admin stuff Xenix had and the nice documentation, but
>we needed something that worked.
I don't think you're missing much. The new AT&T documentation has MUCH
improved guides, and is more "bug" free. The on-line help is a great
boon, though it could be more complete. The only thing I miss is the
ring-binders. Much "easier" to use than softcover books.
I find the sysadm stuff better than the Xenix junk, and I even use
sysadm once and a while. Most of the Xenix scripts had weird problems,
especially if you tried anything that wasn't expected.
(I'm not sure if Bell Tech has the same stuff as 386/ix, but I assume it
does.)
>---
>Eric Pederson
>714-964-3339
--
Greg Woods.
UUCP: utgpu!woods, utgpu!{ontmoh, ontmoh!ixpierre}!woods
VOICE: (416) 242-7572 [h] LOCATION: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
More information about the Comp.unix.microport
mailing list