new groups for iX86 unix (was: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3)
The Cat in the Hat
davidbe at sco.COM
Sat Aug 20 02:51:47 AEST 1988
A long long time ago in an article far far away (<5562 at rpp386.UUCP> to be exact) jfh at rpp386.UUCP (The Beach Bum) said:
-there is precious little point in adding all those groups. someone will
-only think of a new way to add even more groups. what is needed is to
-take the uPort/Xenix flaming out of these groups for good.
We probably won't do that until we either get a moderated
comp.unix.Xenix/uPort OR a comp.unix.flame group.
Comp.unix.flame has a certain appeal. Makes about as much sense as
splitting up into 286/386 groups.
Not that I'm suggesting it, mind you. Just pointing it out.
--
David Bedno (aka The Cat in the Hat) Now appearing at: davidbe at sco.COM -OR-
...!{uunet,decvax!microsoft,ucbvax!ucscc}!sco!davidbe -OR-
At home: 408-425-5266 At work: 408-425-7222 x5123 (I'm probably here...)
Disclaimer: Not SCO's opinions. At least not that they've told me.
"If you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything."
More information about the Comp.unix.microport
mailing list