new groups for iX86 unix (was: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3)

[The Cat in the Hat]

In article <942 at scovert.sco.COM> I (The Cat in the Hat) said (mistakenly):
-
-The whole reason for creating comp.unix.microport was because of the flames
-that were flying in c.u.x about Mport.  

Before I get massive amounts of mail pointing it out, let me say that this
was not the ONLY reason this group was created.  At the time of it's creation
there was about a 50/50 split in requests for info about SCO and Mport xenix,
so splitting it up seemed like a good idea.

There was quite a bit of Mport flaming also, and this WAS a factor.  But not
the entire one.  My apologies for not making this clearer in my previous
posting.

Also, my previous posting refers only to c.u.x, and not c.u.microport.
But I'm sure (by the inevitability of the net) that the same arguments
I used can apply.

-- 
David Bedno (aka The Cat in the Hat) Now appearing at: davidbe at sco.COM -OR-
...!{uunet,decvax!microsoft,ucbvax!ucscc}!sco!davidbe -OR- 
At home: 408-425-5266 At work: 408-425-7222 x5123 (I'm probably here...)
Disclaimer:  Not SCO's opinions.  At least not that they've told me.

"If you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything."