HELP! Floating Point Problems

James Van Artsdalen james at bigtex.uucp
Wed Aug 10 12:33:36 AEST 1988


Liberally edited...

In article <252 at belltec.UUCP>, dar at belltec.UUCP (Dimitri Rotow) wrote:
> DMA is not the culprit.  If the 386 sees a hold request (for example, in 
> *refresh* time, not just DMA or other phenomena), then one of the necessary
> conditions for Erratum 21 occurs.  Note that memory refreshes happen almost
> continually (every 14 us or so) whereas by that reference scale DMAs occur
> at nearly geologic intervals.

I hate to jump into a good flame war between vendors like this, but one
must point out that refresh is usually done via DMA.  Hence, DMA is done
almost continuously on virtually all machines (PC's Ltd 386/16 being about
the only exception I would guess).

> The citation of "wait state" is 
> misleading, since even a "zero wait state 386" will encounter Erratum 21
> with pre D stepping 386 parts. 

How frequently?  My 386 has no refresh cycles at all.
-- 
James R. Van Artsdalen    ...!uunet!utastro!bigtex!james     "Live Free or Die"
Home: 512-346-2444 Work: 328-0282; 110 Wild Basin Rd. Ste #230, Austin TX 78746



More information about the Comp.unix.microport mailing list