inodes on remote disks (was: running out of inodes?)
David C Lawrence
tale at pawl.rpi.edu
Sun May 21 01:18:26 AEST 1989
In article <17641 at mimsy.UUCP> chris at mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
Chris> On modern systems, simply run `df -i'.
This is on a tangent, but here is something that has been noticed on
our SunOS 4.0.1 system:
Filesystem iused ifree %iused Mounted on
/dev/xy0a 620 1428 30% /
life.pawl.rpi.edu:/usr
0 -1 -0% /usr
/dev/xy1h 10047 18625 35% /appl/imagine2
/dev/xy1e 43257 32519 57% /home
/dev/xy0h 24785 28463 47% /appl/imagine1
/dev/xy0e 194 1854 9% /var
/dev/xy1a 602 1446 29% /var/spool/mail
/dev/xy0d 5970 43182 12% /export
rpi.edu:/usenet 0 -1 -0% /usenet
hope.its.rpi.edu:/itss_b
0 -1 -0% /itss_b
hope.its.rpi.edu:/itss_c
0 -1 -0% /itss_c
life.pawl.rpi.edu:/appl/life1
0 -1 -0% /appl/life1
life.pawl.rpi.edu:/usr/local
0 -1 -0% /usr/local
The thing that puzzles us in the curious data for any remote
filesystem; my first wild guess was that the information from the
remote disk couldn't be found by the local df. The problem with that
wild guess, from my perspective, is that it used to work fine under
SunOS 3.5. Now are users get absolutely no useful information
regarding inodes when they are on the diskless Suns; in the case of
/usenet, at least, the information can sometimes be useful to people
who don't really have any control over the disks.
Can someone please tell me why this is like this?
Dave
--
(setq mail '("tale at pawl.rpi.edu" "tale at itsgw.rpi.edu" "tale at rpitsmts.bitnet"))
(error "UUCP not spoken here. Long bang paths unlikely to get mail replies.")
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list