perl and other "non-standard" commands
John W. Eaton
chpf127 at ut-emx.UUCP
Sat May 27 09:26:01 AEST 1989
In article dce at Solbourne.COM (David Elliott) writes:
>
> Sometimes it isn't appropriate to use commands that aren't standard in
> commercial Unix systems.
Agreed.
> I am working on a project right now that has to run on SunOS 4.0 as
> distributed. I can't assume that the customer will have perl, GNU
> awk, or even nawk, even though any of these would make my project
> significantly easier. When Sun decides to make these standard (soon
> for nawk, who knows for the others), then I'll be able to use them.
Well, I don't get it. If GNU awk would make things easier, why not
distribute it with your product? You don't have to wait for Sun to do
it for you.
> Certainly, if you're going to write software that works on a specific
> set of systems that you can control the contents of, use perl, GNU
> awk, and anything else you can get your hands on to do a better job.
Didn't you just say that your target was a specific system/OS? GNU
awk is not universal, but it is *free*. Just distribute it.
> --
> David Elliott dce at Solbourne.COM
> ...!{boulder,nbires,sun}!stan!dce
--
John Eaton
chpf127 at emx.utexas.edu
Department of Chemical Engineering
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas 78712
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list