help needed in cc library search order

Chris Torek chris at mimsy.UUCP
Sat May 6 08:58:59 AEST 1989


In article <176 at larry.sal.wisc.edu> jwp at larry.sal.wisc.edu
(Jeffrey W Percival) writes:
>... Case 2: cc main.o lib2.a lib1.a

>The mystery:  I would have thought that I would get low2() always,
>because lib2 preceeds lib1.  HOWEVER,  I get low1() unless I
>make a call to low2() in main().  In other words, the linker
>chooses differently depending on whether main() makes a call to low().

The linker acts differently when reading a library than when reading
a `.o' file.  If you say

	ld /lib/crt0.o main.o low.o lib1.a	# or `cc' instead of `ld'

you will get your second version of low().  But when you say

	ld /lib/crt0.o main.o lib2.a lib1.a

you are telling ld `read main.o, then *scan* lib2.a, then scan lib1.a'
---so ld scans it, looking for any symbols it happens to need just then,
and finds none.  It closes lib2 and goes on to lib1, where it finds
mid() and *now* discovers it needs low().  It does *not* stop, back
up to lib2, look again, and find the low() there; ld *never* `backs
up'.  If there were no low() in lib1, it would complain `_low undefined'.

What you need to do, then, is convince ld to pull low() out of lib2
anyway, whether it really needs it or not.  There is a simple way
to do this:

	ld -u _low /lib/crt0.o main.o lib2.a lib1.a

The `-u' flag tells ld `make this an undefined symbol'.  Thus, when it
comes across low() in lib2, it will take it immediately.

`cc' might accept -u, or might not; if not, you will have to run
ld directly (and append -lc to tell it to search the C library).
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
Domain:	chris at mimsy.umd.edu	Path:	uunet!mimsy!chris



More information about the Comp.unix.questions mailing list