Unix without tar?
Engineering
scott at bbxeng.UUCP
Fri Sep 1 02:18:54 AEST 1989
In article <10889 at smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn at brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>In article <JES.89Aug30102233 at mbio.med.upenn.edu> jes at mbio.med.upenn.edu (Joe Smith) writes:
>>Recently, someone asserted that tar archives aren't a suitable
>>distribution format because they aren't understood by every Unix.
>
>"tar" archives may not be suitable, but it's not because "tar" is
>unavailable. Every AT&T UNIX release since 7th Edition (around 1978)
>has included some version of "tar"; it's "cpio" that may not exist
>everywhere (particularly 4.2BSD-based systems).
That's not entirely correct. I've seen some 3b2 machines without tar.
We still ship product for the 3b2 in cpio format because of this.
(Note: 3b2 is an AT&T box).
--
---------------------------------------
Scott Amspoker
Basis International, Albuquerque, NM
505-345-5232
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list