Unix without tar?
Guy Harris
guy at auspex.auspex.com
Fri Sep 1 03:59:11 AEST 1989
>Recently, someone asserted that tar archives aren't a suitable
>distribution format because they aren't understood by every Unix.
>
>Given some reasonable constraints of their contents (ascii files,
>names < 14 chars), is this true? Doesn't every Unix have tar?
Every version of UNIX AT&T has shipped as a source code porting base
has, to the best of my knowledge, had "tar". I remember one case where
it was claimed that a vendor offering a binary version built from one of
those AT&T source versions had removed "tar", but hopefully that vendor
was tarred and feathered for that, and served as an example to others.
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list