reverse-tee, or, merging stdout's
Robert Earl
rearl at gnu.ai.mit.edu
Mon Apr 22 16:46:51 AEST 1991
In article <7204 at segue.segue.com> jim at segue.segue.com (Jim Balter) writes:
| In article <1991Apr19.182517.199 at rathe.cs.umn.edu> ian at rathe.cs.umn.edu (Ian Hogg) writes:
| > Maybe this will work:
| >
| > prog1 arg1 arg2 | (cat ; prog2 arg3 arg4 arg5) | prog3
|
| and maybe it won't. If you have doubts, why not try it before posting?
|
| What will work are
|
| prog1 arg1 arg2 | (cat - ; prog2 arg3 arg4 arg5) | prog3
I fail to see a difference between these two. `cat' with no arguments
implies `cat -'. At any rate, this second one is the obvious way to
do it, and is what I suggested in email:
| ( prog1 arg1 arg2 ; prog2 arg3 arg4 arg5) | prog3
--robert
<rearl at gnu.ai.mit.edu>
<rearl at watnxt3.ucr.edu>
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list