Files for all devices??
Chris Torek
torek at elf.ee.lbl.gov
Wed Apr 3 04:48:55 AEST 1991
In article <1991Apr1.203925.19204 at sci.ccny.cuny.edu>
jeffrey at sci.ccny.cuny.edu (Jeffrey L Bromberger) writes:
>So, how come no [/dev] entry for the DEUNA ethernet card? I realize it's
>configured as a pseudo-device ...
Actually, it is configured as a regular `device':
device de0 at uba? csr 0174510 vector deintr
(`vector deintr' really belongs elsewhere, but this is a completely
different topic). The argument against a /dev entry begins with
`what would you do with it?'
(Of course, the same argument can be used against block devices, which
exist primarily to give names to an internal interface. I occasionally
argue for /dev entries for network interfaces. Certainly `permissions
on /dev entries' is a better approach than `magic socket options'. Alas,
you really *do* want filters inserted over top of raw interfaces.
`Protocol stacks' make sense here but the demultiplexing becomes hairy.)
--
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Lawrence Berkeley Lab CSE/EE (+1 415 486 5427)
Berkeley, CA Domain: torek at ee.lbl.gov
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list