X386 on AT&T lockup problem

[E.J. McKernan]

In article <1991Apr12.122901.379 at virtech.uucp> cpcahil at virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) writes:
>
>The amount of traffic related to X386 is picking up steadily and will
>probably consume this newsgroup.  So, what do you think about putting
>together a separate newsgroup: comp.unix.sysv386.x386 or comp.windows.x.x386
>which is dedicated to this product?
>
>What do you think?

Just what the doctor ordered!

Comp.windows.x.x386 sounds like the name to go with.


-- 
   /|_|\   Datalog Consulting, Tucson, AZ
  ( . . )  ejm at datalog.com
   \   /   ...!noao!datalog.com!ejm
    \_/