Since Most Everythings's right with SCO Can we make it smaller?

neal at mnopltd.UUCP neal at mnopltd.UUCP
Mon Apr 29 08:40:30 AEST 1991


->
->In article <204 at mnopltd.UUCP>, neal at mnopltd.UUCP writes:
->> The current (maybe hopefully past) ankle-biting parade over SCO is of no
->> interest to me.   SCO is as great as the world deserves.  Now, on to 
->> business.
->> 
->> I noticed that the Xenix 2.3.2 kernel is about 1000K.   The SCO Unix
->> kernel is about 2000K.   
->
->I thought that the advantage of Xenix was that it was supposed to be tiny.
->I also thought that I had a rather massive kernel on my ISC 2.2.  My
->kernel is 750K.  Are you sure you have your numbers right?
->
->Marc Rossner
->jahangir!marc at uunet.uu.net
->

I quoteth /usr/adm/messages:

L4L5L6MNOPmem: total = 3712k, reserved = 4k, kernel = 1148k, user = 2560k
                                                      ^^^^^

This includes: 2 Computone Boards

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neal Rhodes                       MNOP Ltd                     (404)- 972-5430
President                Lilburn (atlanta) GA 30247             Fax:  978-4741
                             emory!mnopltd!neal 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386 mailing list