Since Most Everythings's right with SCO Can we make it smaller?
neal at mnopltd.UUCP
neal at mnopltd.UUCP
Mon Apr 29 08:40:30 AEST 1991
->
->In article <204 at mnopltd.UUCP>, neal at mnopltd.UUCP writes:
->> The current (maybe hopefully past) ankle-biting parade over SCO is of no
->> interest to me. SCO is as great as the world deserves. Now, on to
->> business.
->>
->> I noticed that the Xenix 2.3.2 kernel is about 1000K. The SCO Unix
->> kernel is about 2000K.
->
->I thought that the advantage of Xenix was that it was supposed to be tiny.
->I also thought that I had a rather massive kernel on my ISC 2.2. My
->kernel is 750K. Are you sure you have your numbers right?
->
->Marc Rossner
->jahangir!marc at uunet.uu.net
->
I quoteth /usr/adm/messages:
L4L5L6MNOPmem: total = 3712k, reserved = 4k, kernel = 1148k, user = 2560k
^^^^^
This includes: 2 Computone Boards
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neal Rhodes MNOP Ltd (404)- 972-5430
President Lilburn (atlanta) GA 30247 Fax: 978-4741
emory!mnopltd!neal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list