Summary: What's wrong with SCO
Bill Kennedy
bill at wrangler.WLK.COM
Sat Apr 20 00:58:04 AEST 1991
rcd at ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn) follows up:
fred at compu.com (Fred Rump) follows up:
dvb at emisle.uucp (David Van Beveren) writes about SCO:
Dick makes some points that most isn't necessarily best and generally IMHO
proves that sales volume doesn't guarantee superiority or applicability.
I'm only following up a couple of sentences, so I've deleted the rest.
>Look, the products from the various vendors have various advantages--
>nobody is an absolute stellar runaway or they'd have all the sales; nobody
>is abysmal or they'd be out of the business.
They _were_ out of business, maybe we need to find a silver stake and a
crossroads for a sure fix.
>--
>Dick Dunn rcd at ico.isc.com -or- ico!rcd Boulder, CO (303)449-2870
> ...While you were reading this, Motif grew by another kilobyte.
--
Bill Kennedy uucp {att,cs.utexas.edu,pyramid!daver}!ssbn.wlk.com!bill
internet bill at ssbn.WLK.COM or ssbn!bill at attmail.COM
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list