IOCALL results and problems
Holtman Jim
jph at whuxlm.UUCP
Sun Dec 22 09:35:03 AEST 1985
> Larry McVoy writes:
> >I tend to agree with Dan. I think what people would like to see is a
> >benchmark which measures how well Unix, running multiple users, performs
> >on each machine. The benchmark would have to measure something that did
> >not vary widely (such as I/O devices), as those results would only reflect
> >how much one had spent on the bus & disk. So, how about this:
> >
> >The dryhstone benchmarks are considered good tests of the CPU (at least by
> >me they are), but don't really test Unix at all (in fact some people run
> >them in standalone mode). How about a version, (called forkstone?), which
> >runs the dryhstone as 1, 2, 8, and 64 concurrent processes? This would
> >show 1) the speed of the CPU, 2) first part of the curve, 8) a nice single
> >user level, and 64) what happens when you have multiple users.
> >
> >It would not test I/O, which is a hard thing to test fairly. It would get
> >rid of those Z80 dryhstones (flame, flame) as they're not multi tasking...
> >
> >I guess if there is any response and nobody wants to do it, I'll hack the
> >drystones. I think it would be better if the original author did it, as
> >{s}he probably can understand that bastardized {C}Ada source.
>
> I don't think that running multiple dhrystones would measure anything more
> than the cost of doing a context switch once every <scheduling granularity>.
> Except on a multiple processor machine, the time will be N*1 dhrystone +
> M context switches. There are easier ways to measure the time to do a context
> switch. If you want to measure multi-user response, you've GOT to open the
> IO can-of-worms, since they WILL be doing IO.
>
> Rick Richardson, PC Research, Inc. (201) 922-1134
> ..!ihnp4!houxm!castor!{rer,pcrat!rer} <--Replies to here, not to homxb!!!
>
> P.S. Rheinhold Weicker is the author of Dhrystone. I apologize for
> creating the bastardized {C}Ada source from his original Ada!
*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***
Results for VAX 8600 running SVR2
1.2 Real
1.1 System
0.0 User
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list